Another pig in the wall?

This post currently appear in TLV Faces

http://www.tlvfaces.com/roger-waters-another-pig-in-the-wall/

Someone please get Roger Waters a new hobby. May I suggest knitting or macramé? Something that keeps him busy and takes his attention away from offending Jews.

 At a recent concert, Waters released an inflatable pig with a Magen David (Star of David) painted on it. A “pig-drone” of sorts. The song was “Run like Hell”. Now far be it for me to drone on (pun very much intended) but displaying a sacred religious symbol next to fascist symbols like the hammer and sickle that represent communism smacks of something far more nasty.

 Now we know Roger is the poster child for BDS and has a penchant for walls and kangaroos (excuse my very lateral reference to the Russel Tribunal!) and would balk at any allegations that would insinuate that he is anti-Semitic. Isn’t he just an artist exploring his creativity?

 Image

No Rog, you aren’t. Your politics are well known. While you have the right to spout your anti-Israel, BDS drivel, however misguided it may be, you have crossed the line. This time you are not making loaded statements about Israeli policy, this time you are taking a holy symbol and aligning it with the most hated forms of political governance.  Straight out of the Goebbels propaganda handbook.

The preferred tactics of the anti-Israel brigade is to disguise their intentions under the cover of concern for the Palestinians of other minority groups in Israel. It is a thinly veiled disguise. I think we should ask Waters where is the pig with the Ahmadinejad head? Where are the effigies spray painted with the likes of the most heinous human rights abusers? If you are at a loss, we have a whole neighbourhood full of them in the Middle East. Some throw opponents off the top of buildings, some throw acid on young girls in attempted honour killings, hell some even call for the destruction of a whole country!

 With rising levels of anti- Semitism around the world, this kind of action is not only offensive, it is irresponsible and alarming. It is just not kosher for a variety of reasons. This does not make you a creative and lyrical genius, all it show is that you have completely lost the plot. 

 Roger may I suggest you run like hell. Run yourself along to a much needed reality check.

No Rebecca Rachmany, Apartheid is NOT just a word

This blog post currently appears in The Times of Israel:

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/no-rebecca-rachmany-apartheid-is-not-just-a-word/

Ms Rachmany’s blog post “Israel is an Apartheid State” refers.

http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/israel-is-an-apartheid-state/

Rachmany asserts that Israel is an Apartheid state because after all, the Apartheid is just a word. “I don’t know why people get all upset when people say Israel is an apartheid state. Like it’s some kind of curse or something. It’s just a word, and it has a specific meaning. Come to think of it, that’s how it is with curse words, right? If someone uses the correct terminology for a person born out of wedlock, the person will most certainly feel offended, whether or not they were born out of wedlock.”

 This opening salvo is so unbelievably trite and offensive that as a former citizen of South Africa, one who grew up bearing witness and yes, as a white child of privilege, I feel compelled to respond. I benefited from the system that was designed to oppress the majority of my countrymen based on their race. I am not proud of this but I am proud of South Africa’s transition to democracy, the same as I am proud of Israeli democracy.

 The definition of Apartheid is not the diluted version included in Rachmany’s blog. Rather it pertains to the legislated laws of discrimination based on race that deemed non-white citizens of South Africa to be second class citizens. The Apartheid laws also pertained to forced removal of people from their homes and their relegation to inferior neighbourhoods.

 

A fundamental fact: there are two judicial systems in Israel and the West bank because one people is governed by the State of Israel and the other the Palestinian Authority.

 

Ms Rachmany, Apartheid is not merely a word or label as you imply. For the millions of South Africans who suffered under the  regime, Apartheid meant oppression and segregation, racial discrimination  and inferior rights. Apartheid was forced removals from homes and for some, forced exile from their country. Apartheid was loved one’s mysteriously disappearing after arrests and never coming back.

 No, Apartheid is not a word to be bandied around like “bastard”. You say that Arab beauty queens are “irrelevant” and so is the assistance we give to Syrian’s in need of medical help. The Apartheid laws permeated every aspect of society in South Africa. The idea of medical assistance to citizens of an enemy country or beauty queens who were not lily white was unthinkable in Apartheid South Africa. So were black entrepreneurs, mixed schools and universities, equal opportunity employment, voting rights, serving in the army and representation in government.

 I grew up believing that there was no such thing as black children, because I never saw any. They were forbidden to attend my school, play in the same park, attend the same ballet lessons as me. I also thought that “nannies”(domestic workers) did not like park benches and preferred to sit on the grass. My childish brain could hardly compute an idea that black people were forbidden to sit on the same park benches as white people.

 This is just a snippet of what it was like. Imagine if you will, what it was like to grow up in a shack, without plumbing, to study in the language of the oppressor and to be excluded from every facet of society including using the same toilet.

 THAT was Apartheid Ms Rachmany. Oh and in Apartheid South Africa, you would not have been allowed to write the above mentioned blog post. You would have been arrested and subjected to a very harsh interrogation.

 

Yes there is racism in Israel. The same as in any other country. It is heinous and unacceptable but to accuse Israel of being an ApartheidState based on the arguments and definitions that you use belittles the suffering of its victims.

 If you are going to use labels, you may want to be more aware. Apartheid is synonymous with suffering and oppression and while it has become trendy amongst the anti-Israel camp, it has very serious ramifications. Don’t dishonour the victims.

 Rolene Marks is a South African olah and volunteer member of the Media Team Israel and Truth be Told, an advocacy body that fights media bias. She has appeared on radio, television and has been published in numerous global publications. Visit her blog:www.rorosrantings.wordpress.com

 

 

Rachmany asserts that Israel is an Apartheid state because after all, the Apartheid is just a word. “I don’t know why people get all upset when people say Israel is an apartheid state. Like it’s some kind of curse or something. It’s just a word, and it has a specific meaning. Come to think of it, that’s how it is with curse words, right? If someone uses the correct terminology for a person born out of wedlock, the person will most certainly feel offended, whether or not they were born out of wedlock.”

 

This opening salvo is so unbelievably trite and offensive that as a former citizen of South Africa, one who grew up bearing witness and yes, as a white child of privilege, I feel compelled to respond. I benefited from the system that was designed to oppress the majority of my countrymen based on their race. I am not proud of this but I am proud of South Africa’s transition to democracy, the same as I am proud of Israeli democracy.

 

The definition of Apartheid is not the diluted version included in Rachmany’s blog. Rather it pertains to the legislated laws of discrimination based on race that deemed non-white citizens of South Africa to be second class citizens. The Apartheid laws also pertained to forced removal of people from their homes and their relegation to inferior neighbourhoods.

 

 

A fundamental fact: there are two judicial systems in Israel and the West bank because one people is governed by the State of Israel and the other the Palestinian Authority.

 

Ms Rachmany, Apartheid is not merely a word or label as you imply. For the millions of South Africans who suffered under the  regime, Apartheid meant oppression and segregation, racial discrimination  and inferior rights. Apartheid was forced removals from homes and for some, forced exile from their country. Apartheid was loved one’s mysteriously disappearing after arrests and never coming back.

 

No, Apartheid is not a word to be bandied around like “bastard”. You say that Arab beauty queens are “irrelevant” and so is the assistance we give to Syrian’s in need of medical help. The Apartheid laws permeated every aspect of society in South Africa. The idea of medical assistance to citizens of an enemy country or beauty queens who were not lily white was unthinkable in Apartheid South Africa. So were black entrepreneurs, mixed schools and universities, equal opportunity employment, voting rights, serving in the army and representation in government.

 

I grew up believing that there was no such thing as black children, because I never saw any. They were forbidden to attend my school, play in the same park, attend the same ballet lessons as me. I also thought that “nannies”(domestic workers) did not like park benches and preferred to sit on the grass. My childish brain could hardly compute an idea that black people were forbidden to sit on the same park benches as white people.

 

This is just a snippet of what it was like. Imagine if you will, what it was like to grow up in a shack, without plumbing, to study in the language of the oppressor and to be excluded from every facet of society including using the same toilet.

 

THAT was Apartheid Ms Rachmany. Oh and in Apartheid South Africa, you would not have been allowed to write the above mentioned blog post. You would have been arrested and subjected to a very harsh interrogation.

 

Yes there is racism in Israel. The same as in any other country. It is heinous and unacceptable but to accuse Israel of being an ApartheidState based on the arguments and definitions that you use belittles the suffering of its victims.

 

If you are going to use labels, you may want to be more aware. Apartheid is synonymous with suffering and oppression and while it has become trendy among the anti-Israel camp, it has very serious ramifications. Don’t dishonour the victims.

 Rolene Marks is a South African olah and volunteer member of the Media Team Israel and Truth be Told, an advocacy body that fights media bias. She has appeared on radio, television and has been published in numerous global publications. Visit her blog:www.rorosrantings.wordpress.com